Sunday, November 30, 2025

API Quoting vs E-mail-Primarily based Consumption – When to Automate, When to Route

This text is a part of a sponsored sequence by Skilled Insured.

In 2025, MGAs and carriers aren’t debating whether or not to automate – they’re debating the place. Ought to submissions be routed via electronic mail and OCR triage? Or pushed via a full-blown API quoting expertise?

This weblog breaks down when to make use of email-based consumption (backed by AI + human ops), when to lean on API quoting, and mix each relying in your service connectivity, information hygiene, and scale.

The Case for API Quoting

Greatest For: Carriers with clear API entry, program managers with identified guidelines, low-friction LOBs

Professionals:

  • Immediate price response, typically <2s
  • No human overview if information is clear
  • Can combine with CRMs or front-end portals
  • Trackable – quote logs, success/fail information

Cons:

  • Solely works with taking part carriers
  • Can fail silently if information is malformed
  • Requires structured consumption (varieties, required fields)

The Case for E-mail-Primarily based Consumption + AI OCR

Greatest For: Dealer submissions, multi-LOB packages, carriers with out APIs

Professionals:

  • Accepts real-world consumption – binders, insurance coverage app varieties, spreadsheets
  • GPT + OCR classify and extract for quoting
  • Extra versatile for mid-market packages
  • Simpler to onboard: works on day one with inbox + entry

Cons:

  • Requires QA fallbacks
  • Barely slower: 2-4 hour quoting SLA vs real-time API
  • Information inconsistency can improve triage effort

Selectsys Blends Each: Hybrid Quoting Layer

Situation What Selectsys Makes use of
Retail dealer sends electronic mail GPT classifier → RQB prep → BPO QA
API-ready submission by way of portal Direct RQB API name → return quote
PDF + consumption type submission OCR → subject extraction → quote set off
Lacking service urge for food data Path to underwriter for determination

Check Case

Shopper: Mid-sized MGA with 12 packages, 4 API-enabled, 8 email-only

Earlier than:

  • Quoting was 100% handbook
  • 3 underwriters dealt with consumption → quote prep → bind requests

After Selectsys:

  • API submissions routed straight via RQB
  • Non-API emails labeled by GPT, triaged by Selectsys ops
  • Quote quantity doubled with no improve in underwriter workload
  • Bind turnaround dropped from 2 days → below 8 hours

FAQs

Can I take advantage of RQB with each API and handbook submissions?
Sure. RQB helps hybrid workflows – utilizing APIs when accessible and fallback workflows (electronic mail, doc consumption) when not.

What occurs if the API fails or service doesn’t reply?
The quote is flagged, and a Selectsys underwriter or BPO crew member follows up by way of handbook quoting.

How do you deal with completely different LOBs in the identical submission?
RQB chains quotes by line – triggering API if supported, fallback to handbook in any other case.

Do we have to format emails or attachments a sure method?
No. Our GPT classifier reads unstructured emails and attachments.

Can producers submit by way of portal as an alternative of electronic mail?
Sure. We will embed RQB into portals or CRMs to set off quotes robotically.

Automate The place You Can. Route Intelligently The place You Can’t.
Let Selectsys deal with quoting with the right combination of API pace and human oversight.

Begin a Pilot

Was this text priceless?


Listed here are extra articles it’s possible you’ll take pleasure in.

Enthusiastic about Automation Optimization?

Get automated alerts for this subject.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles