Events often struggle over whether or not an appraisal is an arbitration after an appraisal award is entered. I lately famous that the Rhode Island Supreme Courtroom discovered that value determinations operate as arbitrations in “Is It Appraisal, or Is It Arbitration? Can Appraisal be Appraisal and Arbitration on the Identical Time?” A Virginia courtroom was lately confronted with the identical scenario and located that value determinations will not be arbitrations.
The case arose after Ephesus Richmond Seventh-Day Adventist Church filed a declare for wind and hail harm underneath its insurance coverage coverage with Church Mutual. The insurer disputed a lot of the claimed harm and issued solely a partial fee. Pursuant to the coverage, the events initiated an appraisal to find out the quantity of loss. Both sides chosen an appraiser, and an umpire was appointed. The umpire in the end agreed with the church’s appraiser, leading to an award far exceeding Church Mutual’s authentic estimate. Unhappy with this end result, the insurer petitioned the circuit courtroom to switch the appraisal award underneath the VUAA, claiming it must be handled as an arbitration award topic to judicial evaluate.
The circuit trial courtroom rejected Church Mutual’s argument, ruling that it lacked jurisdiction as a result of the appraisal course of was not arbitration inside the which means of the VUAA. The Courtroom of Appeals of Virginia affirmed that ruling. 1 The appellate courtroom emphasised that the insurance coverage contract used the time period “appraisal” within the related provision and included “arbitration” solely in a separate part addressing disputes over protection prices. This demonstrated that the events knew the right way to embody arbitration after they meant to take action and intentionally selected not to take action within the appraisal context. The courtroom reasoned that whereas each processes contain impartial third events, their authorized significance and procedural functions are distinct. Arbitration sometimes resolves broader disputes, usually encompassing legal responsibility and authorized questions, whereas appraisal is confined to figuring out the worth of a loss. The language of the courtroom is useful in understanding this reasoning:
We maintain, based mostly on our de novo evaluate, that the events’ contract fails to replicate an intention to categorise the appraisal course of adopted on this case as a type of arbitration underneath the VUAA…The insurance coverage contract consists of specific references to the arbitration of disputes between the insurer and the insured in a provision aside from the one setting out the appraisal course of…That utilization addresses Church Mutual’s settlement to ‘pay ‘protection prices’[ ] incurred by any insured[ ] that outcome from a ‘go well with’ to which th[e] insurance coverage applies.’ …The coverage expressly supplies for ‘arbitration’ within the occasion that the insurer and the insured ‘can not attain an settlement regarding any of the phrases of th[at] Protection Kind’—the shape addressing fee of protection prices….The phrase ‘arbitration,’ in contrast, doesn’t seem within the contract provision masking appraisal awards, the particular provision that kinds the premise of this go well with… Because of this, the terminology within the insurance coverage contract itself resolves the matter earlier than the Courtroom. The contract displays that the events agreed to make use of arbitration because the means for resolving disputes over sure kinds of protection prices. They used a completely completely different time period—appraisal—within the portion of the insurance coverage contract at concern right here. Church Mutual, subsequently, has not met its burden of proving that the appraisal award qualifies as an arbitration award underneath the VUAA. As a result of this distinction in terminology, the insurance coverage contract doesn’t set up that the events reached an settlement to categorise the appraisal course of as an arbitration for functions of Virginia legislation.
The appellate courtroom additionally famous that the dictionary definitions of the phrases supported its interpretation. Arbitration refers to a extra formal dispute decision course of that substitutes for courtroom adjudication, whereas appraisal includes figuring out worth with out resolving broader authorized controversies. As a result of Church Mutual didn’t show that the events meant for the appraisal to operate as an arbitration, it couldn’t use the VUAA to hunt judicial evaluate of the result.
Within the Rhode Island appraisal weblog submit, I famous the next, which must be repeated:
For these concerned in insurance coverage value determinations, this ruling serves as a reminder that the authorized framework governing value determinations varies broadly throughout the USA. Policyholders, insurers, and appraisal professionals should concentrate on how their state treats value determinations and alter accordingly. In states like Rhode Island, events ought to count on that appraisal choices will likely be reviewed underneath arbitration guidelines. The principles relating to the eligibility to be a part of an appraisal panel are typically extra stringent relating to arbitration and must be rigorously reviewed earlier than choosing appraisers or umpires.
Appraisal guidelines are consistently altering, and people concerned within the appraisal course of should sustain with modifications from state to state.
Thought For The Day
“Once I come to Virginia, I really feel I’m strolling on the pages of historical past.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
1 Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ephesus Richmond Seventh-Day Adventist Church, 84 Va.App. 371, 914 S.E.second 184 (2025).
